Daring Intimates Bra, Panty & Blindfold Red L/XL: review

Daring Intimates Bra, Panty & Blindfold at a glance

Daring Intimates Bra, Panty & Blindfold is a three-piece set in red floral lace: a peek-a-boo bra with a halterneck, a string panty with an open crotch, and a matching blindfold. The manufacturer’s item number is 75121, and this review is exclusively about the red variant in size L/XL with EAN 8713221827838.

The specification is short but unusually complete for a garment in this price range. Scala, the distributor that publishes the product data sheets for Daring Intimates, states the fiber composition as 90 percent polyamide and 10 percent elastane, a unit weight of 118 grams, the packaging as a carton of 27 × 17 × 2.3 centimeters, the country of origin as China, and a recommended consumer price of 37.99 euro. Two sizes are available: S/M and L/XL. In Sweden, the item is sold by four stores at prices between 293 and 338 SEK, and two of them had it in stock during the price check on September 12, 2026.

What makes the product worth its own review isn’t the technology — there is none — but that it is a textile garment sold in a category where buyers are used to specifications. A set like this has neither a battery, a motor, nor an IP rating. What can be reviewed is the fiber composition, weight, size indications, care instructions, what the package contains, and how consistently the information is presented at the store level. Just the last part turns out to be the most interesting part.

What does the set consist of?

The manufacturer describes the contents as a peek-a-boo halterneck bra, a string with an open crotch, and a matching blindfold. The front of the package names the same three parts in plain text: "peek-a-boo bra, g-string and blindfold set", along with the model designation STYLE: 75121. It’s worth noting that the manufacturer calls the underwear a g-string, while the Swedish store text at Blush Me and Vuxen talks about a string panty — the same garment, different wording.

In lingerie terms, peek-a-boo means that the bra cups are open over or under the breast instead of covering it completely. On this model, the construction is clearly visible in the manufacturer’s own product images: the cups are shaped from lace that follows the underside, with a band over and an opening in the middle. The panty has an opening in the crotch, which Vuxen lists as its own product feature under the name "öppen gren". The blindfold is a straight strip made of the same floral lace, with tie bands at the ends.

That three parts are included is, in practice, the entire selling argument for the product. When you compare it with Daring Intimates’ own two-piece set 75111 — Peek-a-Boo Bra and Panty — the manufacturer states exactly the same recommended consumer price, 37.99 euro, for a package with two garments instead of three. Based on the manufacturer’s own price lists as the yardstick, the blindfold is therefore free.

L/XL or S/M — and why the EAN number matters

The set is available in two sizes, and each has its own EAN. Scala’s product data links item number 75121-RED-L/XL to the barcode 8713221827838 and 75121-RED-S/M to 8713221827821. Vuxenkul publishes 8713221827838 directly on its L/XL page, confirming the connection from the store side. This text applies to L/XL.

Sizes share the product name, product image, and price but not the barcode—this is exactly the kind of situation where a price comparison goes wrong. A concrete example is in the material: Sexonics’ product page lists EAN13 8713221827821—so the S/M number, even though the item in the product flow is under the L/XL number and even though the page headline does not mention any size at all. Blush Me shows the same thing, just from the other side: there, the shop has entered 8713221827821 as the article number for the S/M variant, and the supplier’s own code 75121LXL for the L/XL variant. Check the size at checkout, not just the price on the list.

What S/M and L/XL correspond to in body measurements, however, is an open question. The manufacturer does not publish a size chart for the two sizes—neither bust-, waist-, nor hip measurements, and none of the four Swedish shops publishes one either. Vuxen’s own product data has a field for a size guide, and for this item it is empty. That is by far the biggest gap in the specification, and it is covered in a separate section further down.

Material and manufacturing: 90 percent polyamide, 10 percent elastane

The fiber composition is the only solid material information that exists for a garment of this kind, and it is published: 90 percent polyamide and 10 percent elastane. Scala states it on the product page, Blush Me reproduces it as 90 percent polyamide and 10 percent elastane in the product text, and Vuxenkul writes the same thing in shortened form, "90 % P 10 % E". The fact that both the manufacturer and two of four shops list exactly the same numbers makes the information significantly more reliable than a single shop listing.

What polyamide and elastane mean in a lace garment

Polyamide and nylon are the same thing. In the EU’s textile labeling regulation, the fiber is "polyamide or nylon," and it has number 30 in Annex I—those two words are alternative names for the same type of fiber, not two different materials. It’s worth knowing because the manufacturer switches between them: article 75121 is described as 90 percent polyamide, while the sister article 75111 in the same range is described as 88 percent nylon.

Polyamide is a synthetic fiber with high tensile strength relative to its weight, and it is the normal choice for fine lace because thin yarns need to be strong so they don’t break. Elastane stands for elasticity. Ten percent is a typical proportion for a garment that should stretch over the body without sitting like a compression piece; the higher the elastane content, the more tightening the fabric becomes.

What can be established from the ten percent figure is above all something about lifespan. Elastane is the fiber in the blend that ages the fastest: it breaks down from heat, from chlorinated water, and from oils, and that is why the care advice for a garment like this is always stricter than for pure cotton underwear. Once the elastane has lost its springiness, it doesn’t help that the polyamide lace is intact—the garment no longer fits.

The blend also explains why the manufacturer describes the bands as elastic and the bra band as adjustable. A set intended to cover two ready-to-wear sizes per package has to solve the fit through stretching and adjustment rather than through graded measurements. It’s a reasonable construction solution, but it shifts the risk to the buyer: if the stretch doesn’t work for your body, there’s no intermediate size to go to.

Colorants and chemicals in a dyed red lace garment

A deep red synthetic garment is, by definition, heavily dyed, and dyeing is the step in textile production where the most chemicals are used. Kemikalieinspektionen describes that dispersions dyes are generally used for polyester and nylon—so exactly the fiber type that makes up 90 percent of this set. The authority also describes that azo dyes are commonly used in textiles, that certain azo dyes can be broken down into arylamines, and that the azo dyes that can form harmful arylamines are prohibited from being used for dyeing textiles and leather articles.

The ban applies to all textiles sold within the EU, regardless of where they were made. Scala states China as the country of origin for article 75121 and names Sunspice Lingerie Co Ltd as the supplier in its product data. That’s more information than most lingerie brands publish, and it’s the only information available about the production stage. No material certification—Oeko-Tex Standard 100 or equivalent—indicates that the manufacturer does not state any material certification, and none of the four stores states any either.

Kemikalieinspektionen also provides figures for what new textile costs in terms of resources: one kilogram of new textile leads to between 1.5 and 6.9 kilograms of chemicals, between 7,000 and 29,000 liters of water, and between 10 and 40 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalents, depending on the fiber type and production method. The set weighs 118 grams, so just over a tenth of a kilogram. It’s a small product in context, but the figures are the only way to put a garment that’s used rarely in proportion—and they point to buying a set that actually gets used rather than three that don’t.

Weight and packaging: 118 grams in a carton measuring 27 × 17 × 2,3 centimeter

Scalas product data states 118 grams per unit, and the product page rounds the same figure to 0.12 kilos. This applies to all three parts together. How the weight is divided between the bra, panty, and blindfold the manufacturer does not publish, and none of the stores do either.

For comparison, the same manufacturer states 0.13 kilos for the two-piece set 75111, 0.1 kilos for Red Temptation Ultimate 3PC Seduction Set, and 0.18 kilos for Kotek Lacina 3 Pcs Set. It says something concrete: 118 grams for three garments is on the light end of the category, and it is an indication of how thin the lace is. A heavier set with the same number of parts contains either more fabric, heavier details like underwires and metal clasps, or both—according to the manufacturer, the Kotek set, which weighs 60 grams more, has an underwired bra with hooks and eyes and sewn-in stocking holders.

The package is a cardboard box measuring 27 × 17 × 2.3 centimeters, and the manufacturer states there are six packages per outer carton. The thickness of 2.3 centimeters confirms that the garments are delivered neatly folded flat in a flat box rather than rolled up in a bag. For anyone ordering discreetly, this is a relevant detail: the package is mailbox-sized and not a bulky parcel.

The package is also the only part of the product that carries printed information. The front shows the model number and the set contents. That the weight, fiber composition, and care instructions are in the manufacturer’s datasheet but not necessarily on the box means the physical care label on the garment is the only care instruction that comes with it—save it.

Fit: adjustable straps instead of graduated sizing

The manufacturer lists three construction details, all of which are about fit: the set is sewn in soft floral lace, the straps are elastic and conform to the body’s shapes, and the bra strap is adjustable. Together, that is the complete fit solution. There is no cup size, no band size, and no grading beyond S/M and L/XL.

Is there a size chart for S/M and L/XL?

No. Neither Scala nor any of the four Swedish stores publishes body measurements for the two sizes. The manufacturer’s product page lists S/M and L/XL as selectable variants without linking them to bust size, waist measurement, or hip measurement. Adult product data contains its own field for a size guide, and for this article that field is empty. Vuxenkul, Blush Me, and Sexonic provide nothing.

That makes size selection the biggest source of uncertainty in the purchase, and it’s worth being straightforward about the consequence: you buy a size that covers two clothing-size numbers without knowing which two. What can be stated is that L/XL is the larger of two sizes in an assortment where the manufacturer itself doesn’t define the boundary. If you’re close to the middle between the sizes, there’s no published information to lean on—and it’s also the situation where the right of withdrawal is most limited, because an opened underwear set is considered a hygiene item.

A practical way to handle this is to start with the bra’s construction. A halterneck bra without underwire, with adjustable neck straps, has a wider tolerance range than an underwire bra, because the cup’s placement is determined by how tightly the neck strap is tied. The same applies to a thong with an open crotch: it lacks the fit-critical crotch panel that otherwise determines whether the underwear sits. The construction is therefore forgiving in itself—which is likely why the manufacturer can sell it in two wide sizes—but it’s a conclusion drawn from the construction, not an information claim from the manufacturer.

Adjustable straps, tie bands and open crotch

The manufacturer states that the bra strap is adjustable and that the straps otherwise are elastic. Vuxenkul’s product text adds that the blindfold and the bra have tieable bands, which is a store claim and not a claim from the manufacturer—but it matches the manufacturer’s own product images, where the bra’s halterneck straps are finished with a tie band rather than a buckle, and where the blindfold has two long bands at the ends.

Tie bands instead of buckles are a trade-off. The advantage is infinitely adjustable fitting and that there’s no metal part that can rub or corrode. The disadvantage is that a tie band slips, especially in a smooth synthetic material, and that it’s harder to recreate exactly the same setting next time. For the blindfold, that matters less. For a halterneck bra that’s meant to carry weight, it matters more.

The thong’s open crotch is listed as a separate attribute by Vuxen and is described by the manufacturer as "open crotch string". Practically, that means the garment doesn’t need to be taken off, which is the whole point of the construction. Hygienically, on the other hand, it means the garment ends up in direct contact in a way that normal panties don’t, and that’s a reason to take the washing instructions below seriously rather than viewing the set as something that only needs to be hung back in the wardrobe.

The blindfold: the part that makes the set more than underwear

The blindfold is the only part that isn’t a garment in the usual sense, and it’s the reason the product ends up in the borderland between lingerie and sex-play items. It’s sewn in the same floral lace as the rest of the set and is tied at the nape.

Here’s an important nuance that neither party states: lace is a transparent material. The manufacturer does not specify how many layers of lace the blindfold has, nor whether it is lined, and the manufacturer’s product images show a simple band with no visible lining. A lace blindfold of this kind should be considered a sensual accessory, not a light-blocking aid. If you want actual darkness, a lined eye mask in satin or a leather imitation is a different product.

What still speaks in favor of this solution is that it’s made in matching materials. A set where the blindfold is stitched in the same lace as the bra and panties hangs together visually in a way that a loosely purchased accessory set does not, and it’s reasonably the whole idea of putting three pieces into the same box. Measurements for the blindfold—band length or the height of the mask part—are not published by the manufacturer.

Washing and care: max 40 degrees and nothing else

The care instructions are the only point where a shop publishes more than the manufacturer. Blush Me provides five instructions for the item: wash at no more than 40 °C, do not use bleach, do not tumble dry, do not iron, and do not dry clean. That’s a store task. Scala publishes no care advice on its product page, and neither Vuxen, Vuxenkul, nor Sexonic does either.

How do you wash a lace set in polyamide?

The instructions above are the outer framework, and they’re restrictive for technical reasons that are worth understanding. The 40-degree limit is set by elastane: the fiber loses its spring-back at higher temperatures, and the damage is permanent. The ban on tumble drying is about the same thing, because the dryer’s warm air locally gets hotter than 40 degrees. The ban on ironing is about polyamide, which is a thermoplastic fiber and melts rather than chars when an iron is pressed against it. The ban on bleach protects both the color and the elastane, which breaks down due to chlorine.

Having dry cleaning excluded, however, is unusual, and in practice that means there is no professional rescue if the garment becomes stained. What remains is hand-washing in lukewarm water with a mild detergent, careful wringing out without twisting, and laying flat to dry on a towel. Use a laundry bag if the set is still going in the machine—because the floral lace has an open structure and catches on snag points and zippers elsewhere in the drum.

The color deserves its own warning. A saturated red synthetic garment normally sheds color during the first few times. Wash it separately the first time, and don’t put it together with light garments afterward either. This is not a task from the manufacturer—it’s a result of the product being heavily dyed synthetic material—but it’s exactly the kind of practical consequence that a materials declaration actually predicts.

What wears out first on a lace set

A textile set of this type has no spare-part management and no wear parts that can be replaced. What breaks first on this design is, in order: the elastane’s rebound in the bands, the edges of the lace where they’re pulled over the body, and the tie bands where they rub against themselves in the knot. None of the three can be repaired without the garment losing its fit.

That means that, in practice, the service life is determined by the number of washes rather than by the number of uses. A set that is used rarely and washed gently lasts a long time; one that is machine-washed warm loses its shape after about ten cycles. The manufacturer publishes no expected service life, and there is no manufacturer’s warranty to lean on — what applies is the statutory right to make a complaint, which is dealt with at the very end.

Labeling and fiber composition: what EU rules require

A garment’s fiber composition is not a voluntary marketing requirement but a legal obligation. EU’s textile labeling regulation states that a textile product must be labeled with the name of, and the weight percentage for, all fibers included, in descending order. That is why the information “90 % polyamide, 10 % elastane” has been published at all, and it is also why it should be trusted.

The regulation allows a small tolerance: a product that contains at most 2 weight percent of foreign fibers may be treated as if it consisted of one and the same fiber type, provided that the quantity is technically unavoidable in good manufacturing practice and is not mixed in routinely. In practice, that means that a statement of 90/10 is not a lab value to the decimal place, but a declared value within an allowed range.

Three garments, one composition — is that enough?

The question is reasonable, and the regulation has an answer. Textile products that contain two or more textile components with different fiber content must be labeled with the fiber content in each component. There are two exceptions: the requirement does not apply to components that are neither the main lining nor make up at least 30 percent of the product’s total weight, and two or more textile products that have the same fiber content and normally form a single unit may be provided with just one label.

The last exception is exactly the situation that applies here. If a bra, a string, and an eye mask are all sewn together in the same 90/10 lace, they form a single unit and may share one label — which is what the manufacturer has done. Nothing stating that the three parts have different compositions has been published, nor is there any breakdown by garment. If you have a specific fiber sensitivity, the care label in each respective garment is the only control there is.

The same regulations also make another thing understandable: that the manufacturer writes “polyamide” on one item and “nylon” on the next. Annex I to the regulation lists the fiber as “polyamide or nylon” under the same number. Both ways of writing are correct, and a store that chooses one instead of the other has not changed the material.

Daring Intimates Bra, Panty & Blindfold compared with the alternatives

Three comparisons are relevant: against the manufacturer’s own two-piece set, against another three-piece set from the same brand, and against a more expensive three-piece set from another brand. All the information below comes from the manufacturer’s own product pages, and the prices stated in euros are the manufacturer’s recommended consumer prices, not Swedish store prices.

Against the Daring Intimates 2PC Peek-a-Boo Bra and Panty

Item 75111 is the same brand’s two-piece set: a peek-a-boo bra in floral lace and a panty with garter bands, metal ring details, and satin rosettes for the open cups. The bra straps and garter bands are listed as adjustable. The set comes in the same two sizes, S/M and L/XL, and is delivered in the same box at 27 × 17 × 2.3 centimeters.

There are two differences in the specification, and both are concrete. The fiber composition is 88 percent nylon and 12 percent elastane instead of 90 and 10—so two percentage points more elastane, which results in a slightly more compressing fabric. The weight is 0.13 kilograms versus 0.12, despite the set having a bit fewer; this is plausibly explained by the garter bands and the metal rings.

The deciding factor is still the price. The manufacturer lists €37.99 as the recommended consumer price for both sets. So two items or three items cost the same amount in the manufacturer’s price list. If you want garters, you choose 75111; if you want an eye blindfold, you choose 75121. There is no price difference that matters in the choice.

Against the Daring Intimates Red Temptation Ultimate 3PC Seduction Set

Item 76401 is the same brand’s other three-piece set in red, but with entirely different contents: a lace choker, a pair of wrist cuffs, and a panty with an open crotch. It’s a set that leans more toward the bondage side and less toward lingerie—it lacks a bra completely.

The specification differs in three points. The fiber composition is 95 percent polyamide and 5 percent elastane, so half as much elastane as in 75121. The weight is 0.1 kilograms versus 0.118. And the size is just one: O/S, meaning one size, compared with 75121, which has two sizes. The recommended consumer price is 30.99 euros, meaning seven euros lower.

The conclusion is that the two sets do not compete for the same buyer, even though both are described as three-piece sets in red lace. 75121 is a lingerie set with one accessory; 76401 is an accessory set with a panty. If you want a bra, you shouldn’t choose 76401, and if you want wrist cuffs, you won’t find them in 75121.

Compared with Kotek Lacina 3 Pcs Set

Kotek Lacina 3 Pcs Set is a three-piece set from another brand in the same distributor’s range, and it shows what you get for roughly fifty percent higher price. The manufacturer lists 51.90 euros as the recommended retail price, compared with 37.99 for 75121, and describes the set as lace and satin with an underwire bra that fastens at the back with a hook and eye, adjustable straps, sewn-in adjustable stocking holders, and a matching string thong. Stockings are explicitly not included. The sizes are S/M and L/XL, the same sizing as with Daring Intimates.

The weight of 0.18 kilos versus 0.118 is the figure that sums up the difference: more fabric, an underwire construction, and metal fittings. An underwire bra with a hook and eye provides support like a halterneck without an underwire does not, and that’s the relevant difference for someone who has something to support.

A noteworthy find applies to the Kotek set rather than Daring Intimates: the field for fiber composition on the manufacturer’s product page for 79848 is empty. So a set that costs 51.90 euros at the recommended price lacks the material information that a set priced at 37.99 euros has. That’s not a reason to refrain from buying it, but it’s exactly the kind of difference this site is built to show — and in that comparison, Daring Intimates’ specifications stand up better than the price suggests.

Price range: 293 to 338 SEK and two stores with stock

Four Swedish stores sell the item with EAN 8713221827838. The lowest price is Vuxenkul at 293 SEK, the highest is Sexonic at 338 SEK. That’s 45 SEK, or about a 15 percent difference — an unusually small spread compared with most products in the category, and a result of the manufacturer publishing a recommended retail price that the stores largely follow.

The stock situation matters more than the price spread here. Only two of the four stores had the item in stock during the price check on September 12, 2026: Vuxen and Blush Me, both at 299 SEK. Both the cheapest and the most expensive entry in the table — Vuxenkul at 293 SEK and Sexonic at 338 SEK — were sold out. The difference between the two stores that had it available is zero kronor, which makes the choice more a question of shipping and delivery time rather than price.

There are published details to go by. Blush Me charges a shipping fee of 29 SEK, a delivery time of 1–2 days, a return window of 14 days, and a return shipping fee of 69 SEK. Vuxen offers free shipping from 799 SEK, which for a purchase of 299 SEK means that shipping is added unless you buy more. So, on a purchase of this size, the shipping cost can be as much as a tenth of the order value, and that is then the only real difference between the two stores.

Two price details are worth noting. Vuxenkul lists a regular price of 419 SEK and a sale price of 293 SEK, a discount of 30 percent, and states that the lowest price in the past 30 days was 419 SEK. Sexonic prices in euros and lists 30.77 euros reduced from 37.99 euros, i.e. 19 percent — and the higher of the two figures is exactly the manufacturer’s recommended consumer price. It says something about how the price is set: the stores base their pricing on the manufacturer’s recommendation and discount from there.

When the stores’ information conflicts

The review of the four store pages produced two clashes worth reporting, because they affect what you actually order.

The first concerns the material. Vuxen lists "Polyamide, 12% elastane" in its fact box, while the manufacturer states 90 percent polyamide and 10 percent elastane. Twelve percent elastane, however, is exactly what the manufacturer states for the sister item 75111 — 88 percent nylon and 12 percent elastane. The reasonable explanation is that the store has been given the material line from the wrong item in the supplier’s range. The manufacturer’s information applies: 90/10.

The second concerns the size. Sexonics product page lists EAN13 8713221827821, which, according to the manufacturer’s variant table, belongs to S/M, while the item in the product feed is under the L/XL number 8713221827838. The page headline mentions no size at all. If you order from there, it’s worth checking at checkout which size is actually added to your basket.

Both clashes follow the same pattern: they occur at the store level when a range with nearly identical items is entered into different product systems. None of them means that any store sells a different product — but they do mean that the store text is a worse source than the manufacturer’s data sheet, and that it’s the barcode and not the product name that identifies the item.

Who is the set for—and who is it not for?

It’s for you who want three matching parts for the price of two, and who don’t need a bra that supports. The peek-a-boo construction and the halterneck straps make the cup show rather than support, and that’s the intention of the garment. That the panties have an open crotch and that the blindfold is made of the same lace point in the same direction: the set is made for one occasion, not to be worn under clothes all day.

It suits you if you want the disclosed fiber composition. 90 percent polyamide and 10 percent elastane, confirmed by the manufacturer and two of four stores, is more information than this product category usually provides — and as the comparison with Kotek Lacina shows, it’s far from obvious that a more expensive set discloses more.

It doesn’t suit you if you need to know which size to choose before you order. No size chart is provided, either by the manufacturer or by any store, and in practice the right of withdrawal is limited for opened underwear. It doesn’t suit you if you want a bra with underwire and support — there, Kotek Lacina is the design that actually offers it. It doesn’t suit you if you want a light-blocking eye mask, because lace is not a light-blocking material and the manufacturer does not state any lining. And it doesn’t suit you if you want a garment that can handle everyday machine washing: five consecutive care prohibitions, including a prohibition on dry cleaning, make the set, in practice, a hand-wash-only garment.

Complaints, right of withdrawal, and the hygiene exception

No voluntary manufacturer warranty specifies Scala for item 75121, and that is normal for textile products — guarantees of that kind belong with electronics. What applies instead are your statutory rights, and they are stronger than many people think.

Under konsumentköplagen, you have three years of complaint rights for defects in the goods. A defect is something that was already there at the time of delivery — a seam that comes loose the first time the garment is used, uneven coloring, a band that is incorrectly attached. The complaint rights apply regardless of what the manufacturer promises and regardless of whether the store calls it a warranty or not. Normal wear and tear, however, is not a defect, and for a lace garment, in practice, the line between the two is the question a dispute would be about.

In addition, for distance purchases, there is also a right of withdrawal for fourteen days under the Act on Distance Contracts and Contracts Outside Business Premises. Here, however, there is a limitation that is particularly relevant just for underwear: Konsumentverket states that the right of withdrawal does not apply to goods that are sealed for reasons of health or hygiene and where the seal has been broken. An underwear set that has been taken out of its packaging and tried against bare skin typically falls within that description.

Blush Me states on its product page a 14-day return window and a return shipping fee of 69 SEK, meaning the statutory time limit and an additional fee for return shipping of its own. What applies to an opened package is determined by the store’s own terms within the framework of the law, and it’s worth reading them before you order rather than after. If you have questions about what applies in your case, Konsumentverket can help you via Hallå konsument.